The Future of Work Motivation Theory

Topics: Motivation, Human behavior, Behavior Pages: 41 (6049 words) Published: November 20, 2012
Introduction to Special Topic Forum: The Future of Work Motivation Theory Author(s): Richard M. Steers, Richard T. Mowday, Debra L. Shapiro Source: The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 29, No. 3 (Jul., 2004), pp. 379-387 Published by: Academy of Management Stable URL: . Accessed: 25/04/2011 09:09 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at . JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at . . Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact

Academy of Management is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Academy of Management Review.


Academy o?Management Review 2004, Vol. 29, No. 3, 379-387.


University o? Oregon

University of Maryland

motivation The topic of employee plays a cen tral role in the field of management?both prac see motiva and theoretically. tically Managers tion as an part of the performance integral equation searchers block at all see re levels, while organizational it as a fundamental building


an overview This introduction represents of the field of work motivation from a theoretical and lays the foundation for the arti standpoint cles The that the Latin on this (mover?.) Building as "the motivation Atkinson defines concept, on direc influence (immediate) contemporary for movement follow.2 term motivation derives from


in the development of useful theories of effective the Indeed, management practice. of the sub many topic of motivation permeates the study of management, fields that compose man teams, performance including leadership, decision ethics, making, It is not surprising, change. so much that this topic has received over the past several in both decades journals and management periodicals. exam recent articles have several work far we have come in researching

agement, managerial and organizational therefore, attention research Whereas

of action" tion, vigor, and persistence (1964: 2), while it as "a process Vroom defines governing ... among choice made alternative by persons forms of voluntary (1964: 6). Campbell activity" and Pritchard that suggest motivation dependent the direction,

has to do with a set of independent/ variable that explain relationships amplitude, and persistence of an

ined how on where this special forum focuses motivation, we are going.1 That the questions: is, we ask is the future of work motivation What theories? are What the critical be that must questions if progress in the field is to be made? addressed is the future research What How can agenda? we or modify current models extend of work so they continue in the motivation to be relevant are entirely new models future? And where to further our understanding motivation needed of employee behavior and job performance contemporary organizations? To understand where the field first understand ever, we must...

References: Adams, S. J. 1963. Towards of Abnormal and an Journal Alderfer, York: Allport, understanding Social Psychology, relatedness, and of inequity. 67: 422-436. New
Hillsdale, Hackman, design ior and Herzberg, World Herzberg, tion Hull, faces: Kanfer, F.
1972. Existence, Press. 1954. In G. The
Publishing. F., Mausner, to work. New B.# & Snyderman, York: Wiley. of behavior. B. 1959. The motiva
Addison-Wesley. 1999. Old 1990s. friends, Journal new
25: 231-292. W. J. Nostrand. A. 1977a. Self-efficacy: change. 1977b. Social Toward a unifying 84: Review, Englewood theory of 191-215. Cliffs, 1964. Introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ:
K. 1938. The conceptual Lewin, surement of psychological Press. University Locke, E. A. incentives. mance, Locke, E. A. 1968. Towards Organizational 3: 157-189. 1996. Motivation and Preventive a
and the mea representation forces
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Theories of Work Motivation Essay
  • Motivation at Work Essay
  • Theories of Motivation Essay
  • theories of motivation Essay
  • Essay about Work Motivation
  • The Theory of Motivation Essay
  • Theories of Motivation Essay
  • Motivation Theories Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free