The impact of rewards on employee motivation in Etisalat Sri Lanka (Pvt) Ltd
The research project is submitted to the ICBT campus in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Edexcel Higher National Diploma in Business Management
ICBT Student ID – NG / HNDBM / 09 / 15
14 – 09 – 2014
“I certify that this research project does not incorporate without acknowledgement any material submitted for a degree or diploma in any institution and to the best of my knowledge and belief it does not contain any material previously published or written by another person or myself except where due reference is made in the text”
K.A.D. Wikum Karunaratne
Approved for submission by the academic supervisor
Name of the academic supervisor: Ms. Nilushi Gunaratne
It is with greatest respect and veneration that, I express my sincere thanks to my supervisor Ms. Nilushi Gunaratne who has been a source of personal encouragement, moral support, intellectual stimulation, and invaluable guidance throughout the preparation of this research report. She was very kind and helpful to me all the times whenever I faced a problem.
I express my deepest gratitude to managers and employees who are working in different departments of Etisalat Sri Lanka (Pvt) Ltd for providing me the necessary data and assistance to carry out this research successfully.
Besides, I would like to thank the ICBT campus management for providing us with a good environment and facilities to complete this assignment. Finally, an honorable mention goes to my family and friends for their understandings and supports on me in completing this research. Without their tremendous support, I would face many difficulties while doing this.
The purpose of this research study was to investigate and analyze how rewards impact on employee motivation in Etisalat Sri Lanka (Pvt) Ltd which is a premier telecommunication provider in Sri Lanka. This research was conducted in order to help Etisalat to analyze the attitudes of their employees towards the reward systems of the company. More specifically it would help the company to investigate which of the reward systems are most preferred and what other rewards motivate the employees. The theoretical part of the study introduces different theories of motivation and rewarding. The empirical part of the research was conducted by using a quantitative research method. The data was gathered with the help of a structured questionnaire. The research supports the assumption that a well-developed and functional reward system can increase employee motivation and satisfaction. The research results revealed that most of the respondents are not satisfied with the current rewards offered by the company. Majority of the respondents have claimed that they are not satisfied with the current level of salary. It was discovered that, for the majority of the respondents, success of Etisalat was not personally important. It was found out that the respondents from customer care department & marketing department are to be least satisfied / motivated. The research results imply that majority of the Etisalat employees are not motivated by current rewards offered by the company thus it is crucial for the management to change the prevailing reward system as soon as possible.
Table of contents
Table of contents
List of tables
List of figures
1.1 Background of the study
1.2 Problem statement
1.3 Research question
1.4 Objectives of the study
1.5 Significance of the study
1.6 Outline of the study
1.7 Project plan
2.2 Employee motivation
2.3 Theories of motivation
2.3.1 Content Theories of Motivation
Bibliography: 1. Aamodt, M. and Aamodt, M. (2007). Industrial/organizational psychology. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson-Belmont Wadsworth.
2. Ajila, Cand, Abiola, A. (1997). Influence of Rewards on Workers Performance in an Organization, Journal of Social Science, Vol. 8(1), pp.7-12
4. Alderfer, C. P. (1969). An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Journal of organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 4, pp. 143-175.
5. Armstrong, M. and Brown, D. (2006). Strategic reward. 1st ed. London: Kogan Page.
6. Armstrong, M. (2006). A handbook of human resource management practice. 1st ed. London: Kogan Page.
7. Baker, G.P. (2002). Distortion and Risk in Optimal Incentive Contracts. Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 37, pp. 728–751.
8. Bergum, B and J. Lehr.(1984). Monetary incentives and Vigilance, Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 7, pp.197-198.
9. Boeree, G. (2006). Abraham Maslow. [online] Available at: http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/maslow.html [Accessed 15 Aug. 2014].
10. Bolman, L. and Deal, T. (1997). Reframing organizations. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
11. Bowen, R. (2000). Recognizing and rewarding employees. New York: McGraw Hill.
12. DuBrin, A. (2002). Fundamentals of organizational behavior. 2nd ed. Australia: South-Western Thomson Learning.
13. Evans, M.G. (1986). Organizational behavior: The central role of motivation. Journal of Management Vol. 12 (2), p 203.
14. Ghauri, P. and Grønhaug, K. (2005). Research methods in business studies. 3rd ed. Harlow, England: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
15. Gibson, J. (2003). Organizations. Boston, Mass: McGraw Hill
17. Kayode, A.Y. (1973) Beefing up workers productivity. The Quarterly Journal of Administration, Vol. 9, pp. 9-15.
18. Kohn, A. (1993). Why incentive plans cannot work. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 2, pp 54-63.
19. Kreitner, R., Kinicki, A. and Buelens, M. (2002). Organizational behaviour. 2nd ed. London: McGraw Hill.
20. Lepak, D.P. and Snell, S.A. (1999) The human resource architecture: towards a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24(1): 31–48
22. McGregor, D. and Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J. (2006). The human side of enterprise. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
23. Nwackukwu, C. (1994). Effective leadership and productivity – Evidence from a national survey of industrial organization. African Journal for the Study of Social Issues, Vol. 1, pp 38-46.
24. Pitts, C. (1995). Motivating your organization. London: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
25. Robbins, S. (1996). Organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26. Scott, S.G. and Bruce, R.A. (1994). Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37 (3), pp.580-599.
27. Vroom, V. (1995). Work and motivation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
28. Wood A.T. 1974. Effects of contingent and non-contingent rewards and control on intrinsic motivation. The journal of Organization Behavior & Human Performance, Vol. 8, pp 217-229.
29. White, R. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, Vol. 66, pp. 297-333.
30. Williams, S.D. (2004). Personality, Attitude, and Leader Influences on Divergent Thinking and Creativity in Organizations. European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 7(3), pp.187-204.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document